Read More in AREA News.

Our reflections on a post-Daley Chicago

by AREA   |   Published Sept. 9, 2010

We sent this to our readers and contributors, and have been collecting responses for the last couple of days.  

In hearing that Mayor Daley is not going to run for office again, AREA feels we have come to the end of an era. We are wondering what you - our friends, readers  and allies - have to say. What did Mayor Daley represent to you and what kind of vision do you have for Chicago's future now that this break with the status quo has occurred?

Here are folks' responses:

Daley has been mayor for almost as long as I've been alive. I felt that we needed a new mayor, but part of me couldn't really imagine what that would be like. When I heard that he wouldn't run and realized that the next election could actually mean a different mayor, I felt like a law of physics had changed. Suddenly I could hazily imagine a more open and equal Chicago, as well as more pessimistic possibilities of our future. In my entire life as a citizen of Chicago, I've never been able to feel this sense of possibility--positive or negative--about city hall. Now, this barest hope of a normal democratic election feels like a revolutionary change. I hope that we can make the next generation of citizens feel this every four years. - Simon Swartzman

Subject: Daley's timing
On the one hand, Chicago's bankruptcy will erupt in the next couple years.  The city's finances will implode like a stepped on beer cup.
On the other hand, there's nothing left to steal. - Neil Rest

Daley oversaw the privatization of parking meters, public housing land, public schools to charter schools, the skyway and a continuously corrupt local government. He used his one and only veto in 22 years to shut down a living wage campaign.... Simply put, his administration represents the local manifestation of a generalized attack and punishment of working people. Chicago deserves better and I hope that the people can use all of their creative power, stifled for so long by stagnant political landscape, to envision a future for the common good of all people in our region.  - Daniel Tucker

Daley Meter tickets
Jason Reblando

To me, Mayor Daley represented complacency in Chicago.  The feeling that "things are just how they are" and that we can't actually change anything because things are either too corrupt or bureaucratic. This complacency split Chicago into two halves, those that had enough power and money to go "legit" and make moves and those that had to go underground and bend the law just to follow their dreams.

Overtime various small venues, vendors, arts organizations and businesses have closed, either because the city forced them or because they couldn't pay the increasingly costly permits and licenses. The result is a real deficit of cultural capital in Chicago, compared to other cities of a similar size.

My hope for Chicago is that it regains the spirit of a "city on the make", and actually execute on that promise and support true independent economic, artistic, and cultural growth of the city. A place where people flock to and stay, and are proud of because they feel amazing things can happen here and their dreams can come true - not because "well, it's a very practical and affordable place to live." - Farsheed
 
I was hoping he'd run again because he's so unpopular it'd be an opportunity for the Green Party. This just opens the door to another unwanted self-important top-down greedy corporate Democrat. - M Wohlado
 
For me, Daley's announcement just raises a big bunch of questions, many of them not at all new. The difference now is the possibility of resolution, if real events and contestations over the next few years change the city's form.

A NY Times article points to much while not really saying anything. "All power radiated from Mr. Daley," the reporter writes. My question is, did Daley win this power by actually conquering the city's political class or just by destroying it? If there aren't enough politicians of substance left to form a new regime, what will define the new politics of Chicago?

There's no argument over Daley's place atop of the city's power structure, but what could this structure do? How much of its force was spectacle and how much material? If the city's business class appeared to capture power, will it be able to independently exercise it? Will it face any viable counterweights? Is any opposition really ready to vie for power? What real forces will be unleashed and what will turn out to be paper tigers?

These are just some questions I'm excited and nervous to have answered. They require attention and analysis but if their resolutions are open, then we also need to act for the kinds of answers we want. - Carlos Fernandez
 
Daley got out just in the nick of time.  At the outset of the recession, the city already was a financial basket case, slipping dramatically further once the Olympics announcement was safely out of the way. 

The huge web of legal (and illegal) corruption, including vast inefficiencies of sweetheart deals to politically connected contractors, was difficult enough to maintain during the boom years.  It became untenable the moment any economic storm clouds appeared, let alone the "Great Recession."

Over and over again City resources were misappropriated so as to pursue political agendas, such as when top Legal Department personnel and high-priced outside counsel were used to pursue trivial cases against anti-war activists, rather than other cases which might presumably have a greater effect on protecting the taxpayers' bottom line.  The Mayor's autocratic style and virtual extinction of any internal opposition meant that small problems festered into big ones because everyone on the inside was afraid to say that the emperor had no clothes -- this was the systemic root of such multimillion dollar boondoggles as the Millennium Park construction fiasco, the Great Loop Flood, the Hired Truck Scandal, etc.  Even absent this systemic graft, the structural impediments to reestablishing financial health are enormous, made worse by the state's and county's insolvencies.

Yet perversely, this financial dysfunction was the key to Daley's hold on power.   Over and over again, "representatives" (really, business elites) of key constituencies -- gays, Blacks, whites, Latinos, etc. -- were bought off through contracts to private businesses and non-governmental organizations.  And thus not only was the fiscal structure perverted, but democracy itself. The illusion of a rainbow supporting the Mayor was regularly trotted out to mask the key class component of Daley's rule, and genuine issues of racism and other forms of oppression trivialized by this fake rainbow of big business supporters.

Your community center might get City funding if you played ball with the Mayor and his pals, but if you were working class and a victim of racist and/or anti-gay police misconduct, at best all you got was the stonewall.  What else would you expect from a man who as Cook County States Attorney and later Mayor spent nearly two decades covering for racist torture by former Police Commander Jon Burge and his crew, let alone countless lesser crimes?  From education to employment to the environment, those who were connected got the inside track, while the vast majority of Chicagoans were screwed.

Unfortunately the huge obstacles to independent candidacies even getting on the ballot (let alone making media buys) -- high signature requirements to get on the ballot, and armies of Democratic Party hack lawyers ready to use the arcane election laws to boot opponents off of the ballot -- ensure that the business elite will choose candidate(s) who have a vested interest in continuing the bullying of his or her predecessor.  Real democracy will only come to Chicago when we have a grassroots upsurge, independent of the Democratic and Republican parties, such as we haven't seen in decades. - Andy Thayer, Gay Liberation Network
 
What does a mayor do?  He must make the schools run well, reduce crime, and provide good public transportation.  On all three, Mayor Daley clearly was a failure. I keep hearing people say that Mayor Daley was good because he brought big business and big projects to Chicago, but really, how hard is it to give an extra silver spoon to a rich man?  on the important measures of his career, Mayor Daley falls short. A new mayor must lower class size in public schools, subsidize bicycles, build trains, and tax the rich to pay for it. - Doug Rosenberg
 
As a relatively new resident to Chicago I don't know what this actually means for the city, and I have a feeling I am not the only one.  Lets be honest, there is a huge population of newcomers to this fine city who do not understand or realize the political sway of the Daley regime.  As an art educator, I wonder if their is truth to his misallocation of funds in the arts.  Claims I have heard argue that he appropriates funding for large scale art projects and productions that will improve tourism, but that these programs lack sustainable community building infrastructure for under served populations.  While I am not sure that these "rumors" are true, I can say that the inordinate disproportionate allocation of funding in this town cannot continue.  It is my hope that whoever takes his seat will do away with the damn tulips on Michigan Ave, and redirect that money into after school arts programs for areas that Daley has long dismissed (cough, cough, North Lawndale, cough) - Jess Kaswiner, The Institute For Arts Entrepreneurship